Citizens’ assemblies given the go-ahead
One of the biggest shake-ups in years in how decisions are taken on the major issues in Bristol has been approved with the introduction of citizens’ assemblies.
It came as the city council’s ruling Labour group threw its weight behind the Green Party’s idea, with backing from the Lib Dems.
The Conservative group led by Henbury councillor Mark Weston voted against it amid fears it would become “consultation on steroids” and add an unnecessary new layer of bureaucracy when, they say, the power of the mayor should instead be returned to councillors.
Residents will be chosen at random like jury service for the assemblies and be paid a stipend to spend time hearing from experts on complex issues, including the climate emergency, before making decisions which could be binding on Bristol City Council.
Labour tabled an amendment to Green Cllr Paula O’Rourke’s motion, which won support from the Greens and Lib Dems, to extend the time to set them up beyond the proposed three months.
Cllr O’Rourke said she had intended to vote against the amendment but, having received assurances from the Labour benches that they were serious about introducing the assemblies, backed the changes, despite the fact they would now be “piloted” rather than fully “adopted”.
Labour deputy mayor Asher Craig told full council on January 14: “This amendment comes from a place that supports the concept alongside, rather than in addition to, elected politicians, but we felt the motion seemed a little restrictive when the focus has to be on deliberation and openness.
“We are ready to start the discussions immediately but we don’t want to be constrained by having to do it within three months because we need to get it right.”
Labour Cllr Estella Tincknell said: “Making sure we get participation from all sectors, social groups and parts of the city is absolutely vital.
“We also need to ensure they are properly funded and supported so they can genuinely deliver.”
Labour said it “radically strengthened” the Greens’ motion by assigning between £5million and £10million from the council’s capital budget to the “deliberative democracy” proposals, including giving communities more power over spending decisions in their areas.
But, Conservative group leader Cllr Mark Weston disagreed, stating: “We are going to end up with consultation on steroids. You will have opinions expressed from the centre of the city, all having the same view, and suburbs won’t have their say.
“The best way forward is to get power back into this chamber.
“We are voted for by our peers rather than an algorithm in City Hall,” he said, referring to assemblies’ random selection.
Addressing Labour councillors, Lib Dem Cllr Anthony Negus said: “This amendment politicises this concept which is meant to be exactly the opposite.
“Decisions on the arena, Temple Island, Western Harbour, the Clean Air Zone have all been completely wrecked by the fact they have had no input from people who might not take the same view as you.
“You are jumping on this bandwagon very late. You have wrecked the system of democracy in this council.
“It’s a cynical process of making sure information is withheld.
“If it doesn’t work in this chamber when there are rules and electoral processes, you won’t let it happen properly when it gets out there to citizens’ panels.
“Earlier today the mayor said scrutiny inhibits decision-making. I cannot bear that, it breaks my heart. If any of you endorse that then this is doomed to failure.” Mayor Marvin Rees said: “I grew up in a city with communities ignored by this organisation.
“I came into politics because the political system did not represent people like me, so please don’t insult me by saying we are coming to democracy late.
“On citizens’ assemblies, we welcome any means of participating but there are some challenges.How do we avoid setting up a parallel process that diverts people from marginalised communities away from formal positions of political power into campaign groups where they are essentially disempowered and not participants in decision-making?”
After the motion was passed, Cllr O’Rourke said: “This is a historic motion that will help us take real action on the climate emergency and hopefully begin to address a growing lack of faith in democracy and politicians.
“Putting important and complicated issues in the hands of citizens with full access to expert opinion will produce stronger and more ambitious climate policies and demonstrate there can be public support for them.”